Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 3, Bot-Aware
- AI Discoverability 60 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 41 out of 100
- Security & Trust 90 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 71 out of 100
- SEO 92 out of 100
- Performance 99 out of 100
- Accessibility 41 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
LibreChat - The Open-Source AI Platform
LibreChat brings together all your AI conversations in one unified, customizable interface.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 60 | Needs work | 31 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 72 | Needs work | 22 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 41 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Auth | 48 | Priority fix | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 71 | Needs work | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 90 | Strong | 25 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Security & Trust | 90 | Strong | 25 | 2 | 1 | View details |
| Performance | 99 | Strong | 15 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 99 | Strong | 15 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
42 Fail
Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished
Content-Security-Policy
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Needs attention
Content-Security-Policy
Issue
default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.
Why it matters
Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.
Check name
Content-Security-Policy
Score
58/100
Status
fail
Category
Security & Trust
Maturity
Established
Goal
Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.
Result
Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".
Validation steps
Evaluate fetch baseline
default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.
Evaluate script execution
script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.
Review CSP reporting
CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback defaultSrc=["'self'","https:","wss:"] explicitFetchDirectives=["font-src","frame-src","img-src","media-src","object-src","script-src","style-src","worker-src"]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual=["'self'","https:","wss:"] expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive."FAILdefault-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","'unsafe-inline'","https:"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILscript-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Forced reflow
Check name
Forced reflow
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Fix guidance
A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}Sign in to see 38 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history