CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 7, 2026, 10:24 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
50/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability44%Agent Easeof Use53%Security& Trust47%GEO, AIO, AEO56%SEO83%Performance45%Accessibility58%
  • AI Discoverability 44 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 53 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 47 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 56 out of 100
  • SEO 83 out of 100
  • Performance 45 out of 100
  • Accessibility 58 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

OrionVM – Wholesale IaaS Cloud Platform favicon

OrionVM – Wholesale IaaS Cloud Platform

No page metadata or readable excerpt was captured.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
44
Priority fix1931View details
Discoverability
33
Priority fix500
Content Readiness
62
Needs work1411View details
Bot Access Control
38
Priority fix020View details
Agent Ease of Use
53
Needs work200
Google Agentic Browsing
66
Needs work200
GEO, AIO and AEO
56
Needs work600
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
SEO
83
Mostly ready700
Security & Trust
47
Priority fix922View details
Security & Trust
47
Priority fix922View details
Performance
45
Priority fix1000
Performance
45
Priority fix1000

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

100 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

Details

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Fetch robots.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch robots.txt

    No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.

    robots.txt is missing for AI crawler policy inspection
  2. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

    robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log2 steps · 10 lines
Fetch robots.txt [fail]! No robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.INFOFetch robots.txtINFORequesting /robots.txt from the site originFAILCheck whether robots.txt content is available actual="no content" expected="content returned" length=0FAILNo robots.txt content was available to inspect for AI bot rules.Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=0 unspecified=21

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

50 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

Details

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

    CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
  2. Evaluate script execution

    No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.

    CSP script execution policy is unsafe
  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.

    CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

    CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=["frame-src"]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Content freshness signals

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

0 Fail

Needs attention

Content freshness signals

Failed check
01

Issue

Content freshness signals are invalid: dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2025-01-28T09:17:51+11:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2024-11-23T05:30:00+11:00)..

Details

02

Why it matters

Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.

Check name

Content freshness signals

Score

100/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.

Result

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Corroborate with sitemap lastmod

    Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.

    Sitemap lastmod corroboration is missing
  2. Check date validity and consistency

    dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2025-01-28T09:17:51+11:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2024-11-23T05:30:00+11:00).

    Freshness dates are invalid or inconsistent
Evidence log2 steps · 8 lines
Corroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=3WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="invalid match" expected="valid match when available" sitemapUrl="https://www.orionvm.com/wp-sitemap-posts-page-1.xml" robotsStatusCode=404WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=3Check date validity and consistency [fail]! dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).; dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2025-01-28T09:17:51+11:00).; dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2024-11-23T05:30:00+11:00).INFOCheck date validity and consistencyINFOChecking collected freshness dates for invalid values, future dates, and inconsistent orderingFAILCheck critical freshness issue count actual=13 expected=0 warningIssueCount=0 issues=[{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00)."},{"severity":"fail","message":"dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-04-29T07:42:28+10:00)."}]FAILInvalid freshness date issue found issues=["dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).","dateModified (2025-01-29 20:50:47) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).","dateModified (2025-01-29 07:13:39) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).","dateModified (2024-10-02 15:32:14) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-13T06:08:46+10:00).","dateModified (2026-05-12 03:29:54) is earlier than datePublished (2026-05-12T16:30:13+10:00)."]

Sign in to see 45 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history