CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jun 16, 2026, 2:23 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
69/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability67%Agent Easeof Use61%Security& Trust85%GEO, AIO, AEO59%SEO100%Performance72%Accessibility91%
  • AI Discoverability 67 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 61 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 85 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 59 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 72 out of 100
  • Accessibility 91 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Free PDF Editor Online - No Sign Up, No Watermarks | SimplePDF favicon

Free PDF Editor Online - No Sign Up, No Watermarks | SimplePDF

Edit, fill, and sign PDFs in your browser - no account, no watermarks, no uploads. Add text, checkboxes, images, and signatures in seconds. HIPAA-friendly, GDPR compliant.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
67
Needs work3032View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work820View details
Content Readiness
73
Needs work1912View details
Bot Access Control
63
Needs work300
Agent Ease of Use
61
Needs work800
API
100
Strong700
MCP
43
Priority fix100
GEO, AIO and AEO
59
Needs work600
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
85
Mostly ready2022View details
Security & Trust
85
Mostly ready2022View details
Performance
72
Needs work1500
Performance
72
Needs work1500
Accessibility
91
Strong700
Accessibility
91
Strong700

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

3 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityDiscoverabilityEstablished

Link headers

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

100 Fail

Needs attention

Link headers

Failed check
01

Issue

No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

02

Why it matters

Link headers let automated clients discover API catalogs, documentation, and machine-readable alternates without parsing page markup first.

Check name

Link headers

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Discoverability

Maturity

Established

Goal

Include Link response headers for agent discovery using RFC 8288.

Result

Link headers failed at "Find useful Link headers".

Validation steps

  1. Find useful Link headers

    No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.

  2. Fetch same-origin Link header targets

    Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

Evidence log2 steps · 9 lines
Find useful Link headers [fail]! No useful agent discovery Link headers were found.INFOFind useful Link headersINFOParse response Link header linkCount=0FAILCompare registered agent-useful relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare community relation count actual=0 expected="accepted as weaker evidence"FAILNo useful agent discovery Link headers were found.Fetch same-origin Link header targets [fail]! Link headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.INFOFetch same-origin Link header targetsINFOFetch same-origin Link header targets and record external skipsFAILCompare same-origin Link target failures actual=1 expected=0FAILLink headers did not expose any same-origin targets to validate.

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEmerging recommendation

llms.txt

llms.txt failed at "Validate Markdown discovery shape".

55 Fail

Needs attention

llms.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.

Details

02

Why it matters

llms.txt is an emerging Markdown convention for giving language-model clients curated context and links before they crawl broadly. Broken, private, or low-signal links make the file much less useful even when it exists.

Check name

llms.txt

Score

45/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish a concise llms.txt index that helps agents discover useful public site context.

Result

llms.txt failed at "Validate Markdown discovery shape".

Validation steps

  1. Validate Markdown discovery shape

    llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.

    Findings
    • Missing H1 title, such as '# Example Docs'.
  2. Score llms.txt structure and usefulness

    llms.txt is present, but its structure or link curation is weaker than the emerging proposal and production examples.

    Findings
    • Missing a blockquote summary. The llms.txt proposal recommends a concise blockquote after the H1.
  3. Probe sampled linked resources

    Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content.

    Findings
    • 1/25 probed links were broken or unreachable.
    • 1/25 probed links did not look agent-readable.
  4. Inspect optional llms-full.txt

    Passed.

Evidence log4 steps · 27 lines
Validate Markdown discovery shape [fail]! llms.txt did not provide the minimum expected Markdown discovery shape.INFOValidate Markdown discovery shapeINFOChecking response compatibility, title, content length, and usable linksPASSCheck content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/plain; charset=UTF-8" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"PASSCheck response is not HTML actual=false expected=falseFAILCheck H1 title is present actual=false expected=truePASSCheck minimum text length actual=18988 expected=">= 160"PASSCheck at least one usable public link actual=77 expected="> 0" linkCount=77FAILMarkdown discovery shape validation failedScore llms.txt structure and usefulness [warning]! llms.txt is present, but its structure or link curation is weaker than the emerging proposal and production examples.INFOScore llms.txt structure and usefulnessINFOChecking recommended summary, sections, link labels, agent-friendly links, duplicates, and unsafe targetsWARNCheck blockquote summary is present actual=false expected=truePASSCheck H2 section count actual=8 expected="> 0"PASSCheck Markdown-formatted links actual=62 expected="> 0"PASSCheck unsafe/private link count actual=0 expected=0WARNllms.txt structure-quality validation completed with warnings reason="llms.txt is present, but its structure or link curation is weaker than the emerging proposal and production examples."Probe sampled linked resources [warning]! Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content.INFOProbe sampled linked resourcesINFOSelecting safe, useful links for bounded probing selectedCount=25PASSCheck probed links were attempted actual=25 expected="> 0"WARNCheck broken probed link count actual=1 expected=0PASSCheck agent-readable probed links actual=24 expected="> 0"WARNLinked resource probe validation completed with warnings reason="Some sampled llms.txt links were broken, redirected unexpectedly, or did not return clearly agent-readable content."Inspect optional llms-full.txt [informational]INFOInspect optional llms-full.txtINFOTrying to fetch /llms-full.txt url="https://simplepdf.com/llms-full.txt"PASS/llms-full.txt returned HTTP 2xx statusCode=200 contentType="text/plain; charset=UTF-8" length=184023PASSCheck llms-full.txt content type is Markdown-compatible text actual="text/plain; charset=UTF-8" expected="text/markdown, text/x-markdown, text/plain, or another Markdown text type"PASSCheck llms-full.txt looks like supplemental full corpus content actual=true expected=truePASSOptional llms-full.txt inspection recorded

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

50 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.

  2. Evaluate script execution

    script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.

  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.

  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback defaultSrc=["'self'","http:","https:","ws:","wss:","data:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'"] explicitFetchDirectives=["script-src"]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual=["'self'","http:","https:","ws:","wss:","data:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'"] expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="default-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive."FAILdefault-src is present but not meaningfully restrictive.Evaluate script execution [fail]! script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive effectiveDirective="script-src" sources=["'self'","http:","https:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'","'wasm-unsafe-eval'"]FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":true,"hasUnsafeEval":true,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":true,"dangerousSchemes":["blob:"]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="script-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted."FAILscript-src leaves script execution broadly unrestricted.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives objectSrcFallback=["'self'","http:","https:","ws:","wss:","data:","blob:","'unsafe-inline'"] frameAncestors=["'self'"] formCount=0WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

Sign in to see 27 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history