CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 18, 2026, 1:51 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
70/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability72%Agent Easeof Use59%Security& Trust47%GEO, AIO, AEO52%SEO100%Performance100%Accessibility93%
  • AI Discoverability 72 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 59 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 47 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 52 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 100 out of 100
  • Accessibility 93 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Tap Project - Insight Teknologi, Bisnis & Inovasi Global

Tap Project adalah portal informasi yang membahas teknologi, bisnis digital, inovasi, serta tren terbaru dari seluruh dunia untuk membantu Anda tetap selangkah lebih maju.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
72
Needs work3500
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
81
Mostly ready2300
Bot Access Control
69
Needs work400
Agent Ease of Use
59
Needs work300
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong300
GEO, AIO and AEO
52
Needs work523View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
35
Priority fix123View details
SEO
100
Strong900
SEO
100
Strong900
Security & Trust
47
Priority fix934View details
Security & Trust
47
Priority fix934View details
Performance
100
Strong1700
Performance
100
Strong1700

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Frame protection

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

28 Fail

Needs attention

Frame protection

Failed check
01

Issue

No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

Details

02

Why it matters

Frame protection blocks hostile sites from embedding pages in deceptive frames, reducing clickjacking and UI redressing risk.

Check name

Frame protection

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Prevent unwanted framing with an enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive or a valid X-Frame-Options fallback.

Result

Frame protection failed at "Validate X-Frame-Options".

Validation steps

  1. Validate CSP frame-ancestors

    No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.

    CSP frame-ancestors is missing or ineffective
  2. Validate X-Frame-Options

    No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.

    X-Frame-Options is missing, invalid, or obsolete
  3. Review observed browser responses

    One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

    Observed same-origin HTML responses lack frame protection
Evidence log3 steps · 12 lines
Validate CSP frame-ancestors [warning]! No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.INFOValidate CSP frame-ancestorsINFORead CSP frame-ancestors signals enforcingHeaderPresent=true reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false metaFrameAncestors=false policyCount=1 duplicateDirectives=[]WARNCompare effective frame-ancestors directive actual="missing" expected="valid restrictive enforcing frame-ancestors" issue="No enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present."WARNNo enforcing CSP frame-ancestors directive is present.Validate X-Frame-Options [fail]! No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.INFOValidate X-Frame-OptionsINFORead X-Frame-Options fallback value="missing" parsedValues=[] normalizedValues=[]FAILCompare X-Frame-Options value actual="missing" expected="DENY or SAMEORIGIN" valid=false obsoleteAllowFrom=false duplicateOrConflicting=false issue="No valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present."FAILNo valid X-Frame-Options fallback is present.Review observed browser responses [warning]! One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.INFOReview observed browser responsesINFOSample Chrome-observed same-origin responses observedResponseCount=8 sameOriginCount=7 htmlDocumentCount=2WARNCompare observed HTML frame protection actual={"missingOrInvalidFrameProtectionCount":2,"broadFrameAncestorsCount":0,"affected":[{"url":"https://tapproject.net/","status":200,"resourceType":"document","contentType":"text/html; charset=UTF-8","contentSecurityPolicy":"upgrade-insecure-requests","contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null},{"url":"https://tapproject.net/favicon.ico","status":404,"resourceType":"other","contentType":"text/html","contentSecurityPolicy":"upgrade-insecure-requests","contentSecurityPolicyReportOnly":null}]} expected="0 missing/invalid or broad same-origin HTML responses" issue="One or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection."WARNOne or more same-origin HTML documents observed by Chrome did not emit valid frame protection.

Security & TrustSecurity & TrustEstablished

Content-Security-Policy

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

25 Fail

Needs attention

Content-Security-Policy

Failed check
01

Issue

CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

Details

02

Why it matters

Content Security Policy reduces the impact of injection bugs by limiting where scripts, styles, frames, forms, and other browser resources can load or execute.

Check name

Content-Security-Policy

Score

50/100

Status

fail

Category

Security & Trust

Maturity

Established

Goal

Constrain browser resource loading and script execution with an enforcing Content-Security-Policy header.

Result

Content-Security-Policy failed at "Evaluate fetch baseline".

Validation steps

  1. Evaluate fetch baseline

    CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.

    CSP fetch baseline is too broad or missing
  2. Evaluate script execution

    No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.

    CSP script execution policy is unsafe
  3. Review hardening directives

    CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.

    CSP hardening directives are missing or weak
  4. Review CSP reporting

    CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

    CSP reporting is missing or incomplete
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Evaluate fetch baseline [fail]! CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.INFOEvaluate fetch baselineINFOEvaluate resource loading fallback explicitFetchDirectives=[]FAILCompare fetch baseline actual="0 explicit fetch directives" expected="restricted default-src or broad explicit fetch coverage" issue="CSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback."FAILCSP does not define default-src; several fetch directives may have no restrictive fallback.Evaluate script execution [fail]! No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.INFOEvaluate script executionINFOInspect effective script directive FAILCompare script execution posture actual={"hasNonce":false,"hasHash":false,"hasStrictDynamic":false,"hasUnsafeInline":false,"hasUnsafeEval":false,"hasWildcardHost":false,"hasBroadScheme":false,"dangerousSchemes":[]} expected="constrained script sources without unsafe execution allowances" issue="No script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution."FAILNo script-src or default-src directive constrains script execution.Review hardening directives [warning]! CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.INFOReview hardening directivesINFOInspect CSP hardening directives formCount=1WARNCompare recommended hardening coverage actual=["object-src","base-uri","form-action"] expected="no missing object-src/base-uri/form-action requirements" issue="CSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action."WARNCSP is missing recommended hardening directives: object-src, base-uri, form-action.Review CSP reporting [warning]! CSP does not define a reporting endpoint.INFOReview CSP reportingINFOInspect CSP reporting directives reportOnlyHeaderPresent=false reportOnlyDirectives=[]WARNCompare violation reporting configuration actual="no reporting endpoint" expected="report-to or report-uri present" issue="CSP does not define a reporting endpoint."WARNCSP does not define a reporting endpoint.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

4 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 47/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Failed check
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

47/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 47/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 0. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 57/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Warning
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, sameAs.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

57/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 57/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Warning
01

Issue

Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

81/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.

Sign in to see 27 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history